NEW DELHI –
Zee5 has removed the human rights drama Satluj from its Indian streaming service on July 5, two days after the film’s launch on July 3.
The removal marks the latest escalation in a multi-year regulatory conflict involving India’s Central Board of Film Classification (CBFC) and government pressure, highlighting the volatility of digital distribution for politically sensitive content in the region.
Zee5 issued a statement via social media regarding the decision:
“In light of current developments, Satluj will be unavailable in India until further notice.”
The streaming service did not specify the “current developments” but stated it remains committed to “exploring every appropriate avenue through due process to bring the film back to our audiences.” In a separate Instagram post, the platform added that while the film “may have paused,” the conversation it initiated has not.
The film is currently available to audiences outside of India, where it continues to stream on Zee5’s international platforms.
Regulatory Friction and Subject Matter
Directed by Honey Trehan and starring Diljit Dosanjh, Satluj depicts the campaign of human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra to uncover the unlawful killings and disappearances of thousands of Sikhs by Punjab police between 1984 and 1994. The narrative closely tracks Khalra’s investigation into alleged extrajudicial killings and mass cremations, positioning the film squarely in India’s long-running debate over state accountability and minority rights.
Khalra disappeared in September 1995. A decade later, six Punjab police officers were convicted of his abduction and murder by an Indian court, a verdict widely seen by rights advocates as a rare instance of official accountability for abuses during the period of militancy in Punjab.
The production, a collaboration between Ronnie Screwvala’s RSVP Movies and MacGuffin Pictures-a banner founded by Trehan and Abhishek Chaubey-underwent several title changes before its brief release. The project was originally titled Ghallughara, a Punjabi term for historic massacres of the Sikh people, and was later renamed Punjab ’95 before finally releasing as Satluj. The shifting titles mirrored the scrutiny the film attracted over its treatment of Punjab’s recent political history.
Certification and Distribution Hurdles
The film’s path to distribution has been characterized by prolonged disputes with the CBFC, the statutory body that regulates public exhibition of films under India’s Cinematograph Act. Trehan stated that following the film’s submission in late 2022, the board demanded numerous cuts and a change to the original title, a process that effectively kept the movie out of Indian cinemas even as it drew interest from international festivals.
These disputes led to the following distribution milestones:
- 2023: The production team withdrew the film from the Toronto International Film Festival ahead of its scheduled world premiere, after it failed to secure a timely certificate from Indian authorities.
- 2025: The film remained without a certificate. During a private screening at Cannes, Trehan stated, “There’s pressure on my producers to write off the film, coming from government officials, from central government officials.”
With the Zee5 release in July 2026, the filmmakers appeared to have found a digital route to Indian audiences, bypassing theatrical exhibition. The abrupt removal two days later has revived industry concerns that streaming platforms-once seen as a safer space for politically sensitive work-are increasingly vulnerable to the same informal and formal pressures that shape India’s cinema and broadcast sectors.
Following the removal of the film from Zee5, Trehan told The Indian Express: “I got to know about the removal of Satluj from ZEE5 in India at around 8:15 pm on Sunday. I am at a loss right now. I don’t know how to react to this development.” His comments underscore the uncertainty facing filmmakers who rely on digital platforms to reach domestic audiences when theatrical release is blocked or delayed.
The case also lands at a time when India’s broader framework for online content is in flux, with proposed amendments to the Cinematograph Act and evolving IT rules prompting sustained debate over how far regulatory oversight of streaming platforms should extend. For creators working with material that touches on security forces, communal violence or separatist movements, Satluj now serves as a fresh example of how quickly access can be curtailed even after a long-delayed release.
<div class="lrv-a-crop-16x9" style="padding-bottom:calc((1024/732)*100%);">
<img class="c-lazy-image__img lrv-u-background-color-grey-lightest lrv-u-width-100p lrv-u-display-block lrv-u-height-auto" src="https://deadline.com/wp-content/themes/pmc-deadline-2019/assets/public/lazyload-fallback.jpg" data-lazy-src="https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?w=215" alt="" data-lazy-srcset="https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg 1080w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=107,150 107w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=215,300 215w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=732,1024 732w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=72,100 72w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=43,60 43w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=335,468 335w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=150,210 150w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=110,154 110w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=285,398 285w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=172,240 172w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=320,447 320w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=343,480 343w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=640,895 640w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=429,600 429w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=800,1119 800w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=549,768 549w, https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/WhatsApp-Image-2026-07-06-at-9.45.05-AM.jpeg?resize=1024,1432 1024w" data-lazy-sizes="(min-width: 87.5rem) 1000px, (min-width: 78.75rem) 681px, (min-width: 48rem) 450px, (max-width: 48rem) 250px" height="1024" width="732" decoding="async"/>
</div>The film remains unavailable in India pending further legal or regulatory developments, even as it continues to shape a contentious conversation about how India’s institutions police the boundaries of on-screen political memory.