Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Track

NEW YORK –

Markets moved lower on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, as investors recalibrated risk amid renewed military action in the Persian Gulf and a sharp rise in oil prices that the International Energy Agency (IEA) sought to counter with an unprecedented release from emergency stockpiles. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 434 points, or 0.9%; the S&P 500 traded down 0.4%; and the Nasdaq Composite dipped 0.2%. West Texas Intermediate futures climbed about 4% to roughly $86 per barrel, while Brent crude traded about 4% higher at $91 per barrel. The consumer price index rose 2.4% year over year in February 2026, keeping headline inflation close to major central banks’ stated targets but leaving policymakers exposed to a new energy shock. Oracle shares rose 10% after the vendor reported fiscal third-quarter results that exceeded analysts’ expectations and raised its fiscal 2027 revenue forecast.

Key market moves and policy steps

• Equities: Dow down 434 points (‑0.9%); S&P 500 down 0.4%; Nasdaq down 0.2% (March 11, 2026).
• Oil: WTI up ~4% to ~$86/bbl; Brent up ~4% to ~$91/bbl.
• Inflation: CPI +2.4% year-over-year (February 2026), near typical inflation targets but vulnerable to pass-through from higher energy prices.
• Strategic action: The International Energy Agency announced a coordinated release of 400 million barrels from reserves – described by the agency as the largest-ever such release, taken under the emergency collective-action procedures overseen by its Governing Board.
• Security events: U.S. forces on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, reportedly sunk several Iranian vessels, including 16 minelayers, near the Strait of Hormuz; the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations reported that three cargo ships off Iran’s coast were struck by projectiles.
• Corporate: Oracle posted stronger-than-expected fiscal third-quarter revenue and earnings and raised its fiscal 2027 revenue outlook, prompting a roughly 10% jump in its share price.

The moves reflect a direct transmission channel from maritime security to energy markets and, through them, to inflation readings and corporate earnings. Disruption risks concentrated on the Strait of Hormuz – a principal transit corridor for seaborne crude and refined products – have driven traders to reprice near-term risk premia in oil, while economic data that remain consistent with easing underlying price pressures have so far not fully offset the market impact of supply concerns.

IEA release and how strategic reserves operate

The IEA’s decision to release 400 million barrels marks an unusually large coordinated intervention in strategic petroleum reserves intended to blunt an acute supply shock. Under the agency’s emergency response framework, member governments are required to hold at least 90 days of net oil imports in public or industry stocks and can implement collective stockdraws when disruptions threaten global flows, a mechanism formalized after the 1970s oil crises and embedded in the IEA’s founding agreement.[[3]] The announcement on March 11, 2026, followed an extraordinary meeting of member governments and was framed as a direct response to supply disruption attributable to the U.S.-Iran military confrontation and related attacks on shipping.

The choice to deploy reserves at scale is consequential because it represents a clear, government-backed attempt to neutralize part of the price impact from restricted shipping and damaged export capacity. It is also a signal to producers and consumers that advanced economies are prepared to use strategic buffers to smooth price spikes, even as they pursue longer-term transitions away from oil.

The release is significant for market functioning because strategic stocks are, by design, finite and intended as a temporary offset for acute shortages. IEA members collectively hold more than a billion barrels in emergency reserves, but drawing down 400 million barrels meaningfully reduces spare capacity if the conflict and associated disruptions persist over months rather than weeks.[[1]] With refined product flows – jet fuel among them – highlighted as a particular point of fragility, the intervention targets crude availability but cannot directly substitute for downstream refinery outputs where logistical bottlenecks exist or where refinery maintenance schedules limit throughput.

Maritime security, trade flows and the energy complex

Military operations near the Strait of Hormuz on March 10, 2026, and reports of merchant vessels struck off Iran’s coast add operational risk to a corridor where a substantive portion of global seaborne crude transits. The sinking of several vessels identified as minelayers increases uncertainty around safe passage and raises costs for shippers, insurers and charterers as they reassess routing and exposure. Those commercial responses typically feed back into physical markets through higher freight and insurance premia and can compress effective supply even when nominal export volumes remain steady.

The Strait of Hormuz has long been treated by energy and security policymakers as a systemic chokepoint: a disruption there can quickly ripple across crude benchmarks, refined products and even liquefied natural gas flows. Market participants on Wednesday cited the potential mismatch between crude supplied into terminals and the refined products that ultimately move into aviation and industrial fuel markets; refined-product scarcity can persist even once crude availability is restored, by virtue of plant configurations, maintenance schedules and regional refinery balances.

“I think the markets are wrestling with that idea of what is the off-ramp at this point,”

– Ron Albahary, chief investment officer at Laird Norton Wetherby. “Both sides have dug their heels in, and it’s hard to see how this comes out positively on the other side in the short term.”

Implications for corporate earnings and sector performance

A sustained elevation in oil prices would compress margins for energy‑intensive sectors and consumer-facing companies that cannot pass higher input costs to end users quickly, amplifying downside risk to earnings and valuations. Airlines, logistics providers, chemical producers and parts of the consumer discretionary complex would be particularly exposed if jet fuel and diesel prices stay elevated into the summer driving and travel season.

That potential has already been flagged in sell‑side notes pointing to the earnings sensitivity of European and U.S. corporates to an extended oil spike. In equities, the technology and software sectors continued to show dispersion: Oracle’s stronger-than-expected fiscal third-quarter performance and an upward revision to its fiscal 2027 revenue guidance produced an outsize positive move for its shares on March 11, 2026, demonstrating how idiosyncratic corporate news can buck broader market trends on a given session.

Oracle’s position as a major provider of enterprise software, database systems and cloud infrastructure gives its results signal value for enterprise IT spending trends, particularly in software licensing and cloud migrations that drive recurring revenue. The company’s earnings beat and revenue raise have immediate portfolio implications for index weighting and sector flows, given its market capitalization and coverage, and feed into broader debates over whether corporate technology budgets can remain resilient in a higher-cost energy environment.

Policy, regulatory and market oversight dimensions

The IEA’s coordinated release is a policy lever; it operates within the framework of member‑country reserve management and is executed at national discretion consistent with domestic stockholding laws and energy security mandates. The decision underscores how energy policy, traditionally framed as a long-term climate and infrastructure question, can revert overnight to crisis management when physical supply routes are threatened. The step will be monitored by commodity desks, sovereign reserve managers and market regulators for its effect on spot prices, futures curves and observable inventory data.

Separately, maritime security incidents invite heightened involvement from regional and international agencies responsible for trade safety and navigation oversight; governments and industry consortia typically adjust guidance for operators and insurers in response to such events, including potential changes to recommended routing, onboard security protocols and war-risk premia in marine insurance markets.

Emmanuel Cau, head of European equity strategy at Barclays, noted the market sensitivity to oil and geopolitical developments: “Trump suggesting the war may be ending soon, post an extraordinary surge in oil volatility, may imply his ‘pain threshold’ has been reached, in our view,” he wrote in a Wednesday note. “The longer the oil spike persists, the higher the downside risk to earnings and valuations.”

The consumer price index increase of 2.4% year over year in February 2026 provides a contemporaneous data point on inflation that central banks and fiscal authorities will factor into policy calibration, but the near‑term policy response will hinge on whether elevated energy costs prove transient or persistent. A prolonged spike would complicate efforts by major central banks to declare victory over inflation and could delay or dilute anticipated rate cuts, with knock-on effects for borrowing costs and equity valuations.

The International Energy Agency and Oracle provide institutional context for the supply and corporate developments described above: the IEA, whose mandate is grounded in ensuring secure and sustainable energy for its members, coordinates stock releases and publishes data and analysis that inform national energy-security decisions, while Oracle publishes investor materials and statements that frame its revenue guidance and quarterly reporting for regulators and shareholders alike.

For now, the IEA’s coordinated release of 400 million barrels is the confirmed next procedural step, buying time for diplomats and defense officials to de‑escalate tensions in the Gulf – and for markets to determine whether this week’s price shock marks a short‑lived scare or the start of a more durable shift in the global energy and inflation landscape.